Edited by Nellie Bristol
Volume 20 Supplement 2
Lessons Learned from Global Polio Eradication - Part 1
Research
Publication of this supplement was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1178578 , Teaching Global Health Leaders about the Lessons Learned from Polio Eradication). The articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. The Supplement Editor declares that they have no competing interests.
-
Citation: 成人头条 2020 20(Suppl 2):1177
-
Synthesis and translation of research and innovations from polio eradication (STRIPE): initial findings from a global mixed methods study
Lessons from polio eradication efforts and the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) are useful for improving health service delivery and outcomes globally. The Synthesis and Translation of Research and I...
Citation: 成人头条 2020 20(Suppl 2):1176 -
Sampling method for surveying complex and multi-institutional partnerships: lessons from the Global Polio Eradication Initiative
Complex global initiatives, like the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), have prevented millions of paralyses and improved the health status of diverse populations. Despite the logistical challenges th...
Citation: 成人头条 2020 20(Suppl 2):1197 -
Evaluating the process of partnership and research in global health: reflections from the STRIPE project
Thoughtful and equitable engagement with international partners is key to successful research. STRIPE, a consortium of 8 academic and research institutions across the globe whose objective is to map, synthesiz...
Citation: 成人头条 2020 20(Suppl 2):1058
Annual Journal Metrics
-
Citation Impact 2023
Journal Impact Factor: 3.5
5-year Journal Impact Factor: 3.9
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.386
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 1.253
Speed 2023
Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 7
Submission to acceptance (median days): 173
Usage 2023
Downloads: 24,332,405
Altmetric mentions: 24,308 -
Peer-review Terminology
-
The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:
Identity transparency: Single anonymized
Reviewer interacts with: Editor
Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication